Which Systems Development approach is similar to traditional SDLC yet more repetitive and incremental?

The approach that is similar to traditional Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) yet embodies both a repetitive and incremental process is Phased Development. This methodology involves breaking down the project into distinct phases, allowing parts of the system to be developed, tested, and implemented in stages rather than all at once.

Phased Development allows for iterative refinement, as each phase can incorporate feedback and adjustments. This process particularly mirrors traditional SDLC, which is linear, yet introduces elements of repetition and incremental improvements through its phased structure. The iterative nature of Phased Development addresses some of the limitations of the traditional model by enabling ongoing evaluation and adjustment, ultimately leading to a more adaptable and efficient development process.

Other approaches such as Agile Development and RAD Development emphasize flexibility and speed but follow different principles. Agile is focused on iterative development in short cycles but is less structured in terms of distinct phases. RAD Development prioritizes rapid prototyping over planning, which differs from the systematic approach of Phased Development. Object-Oriented System Development focuses on the use of objects and classes in programming but does not inherently introduce the incremental and repetitive nature that is characteristic of the phased approach.